Yeah, we usually mean this Apple, when we spill digital ink, not today, instead the edible varieties:
Hat tip to Erik Pelton who tweeted about the federal registration of LUDACRISP for fresh apples.
We know something about non-ludicrous trademark protection for apples > First Kiss and Rave.
They are newly minted brands for the MN55 Apple, a cross between HoneyCrisp and MonArk.
As it turns out, Honeycrisp might have been a trademark, but for its inclusion in a plant patent.
If an apple a day keeps the doctor away, does that include juris doctors who are into trademarks?
Or, would it be ludicrous for Apple, you know the iPhone XS one, to name a device Honeycrisp?
If only Honeycrisp could be a University of Minnesota apple trademark; Apple still has a chance.
To grasp lessons learned from the Honeycrisp story, and fully digest the Best Buy brand refresh, join us in Minneapolis on Thursday, a few seats remain for our Creative Brand Protection II event:
Winthrop & Weinstine’s Trademark and Brand Protection practice group will host a few hours of trademark and brand protection education, food and drink, and networking!
For the educational portion of the evening, we’ll share valuable insights and guidance for those who love brands and want to learn creative strategies for maximizing their value.
Yours truly, will moderate a panel discussion joined by:
- Karen Brennan, Senior Director, Intellectual Property, Best Buy
- Anne Hall, Technology Strategy Manager-Life Sciences, University of Minnesota
- Aaron Keller, Co-Author: The Physics of Brand; Co-Founder Capsule Design
- Tim Sitzmann, Trademark and Brand Protection Attorney, Winthrop & Weinstine
The panel will share best practices and creative approaches to both launching new brands and refreshing a mature brand. The panel will develop a robust discussion using the University of Minnesota’s MN55 apple launch and Best Buy’s brand refresh to explore the following themes:
- Transforming a commodity into a valuable brand
- Strategies for selecting and owning names and marks
- Carving a path for global trademark and brand protection
- Legal considerations for refreshing a brand’s visual identity
Reserve your spot now, space is limited. We hope you will join this lively and informative event!
And, I’ll say it again, if only Honeycrisp was an apple trademark, or an Apple trademark . . . .
In the meantime, since Honeycrisp is generic for fresh edible apples, is this stylization distinctive?
Nope, the pedestrian style is not striking enough to be trademark ownable, contrast Miller’s Lite.
The post If Only HoneyCrisp Was an Apple Trademark appeared first on DuetsBlog.
No comments:
Post a Comment